The statement of theelectronic library "LIB"VladimirKushnaryovtoJimmy Wales
Not the first day and not the first year we see the cries of the owner of popular Internet encyclopedia "Wikipedia" on their pages about hard life of the free project. I think that everybody would agree with me in that "Wikipedia" is an idea "on a million" and it is very surprising that the owner did not become yet a millionaire. More precisely, he would not be a millionaire satisfied with the income from his other, commercial projects.Contrary excuses Jimmy Wales I believe that it is not necessary to make Wikipedia paid for visitors for material gain. This is proven by many web resources, such as social networks Facebook, Вконтакте, which, being free to the public, are profitable for their owners. Only 2 stealth advertisings and popular russian quotation site Bash.org also earns money for its owners. What prevents to make so with world-renowned internet-resource like Wikipedia?
Best regards,
Vladimir Kushnaryov,
administrator of uniquely free
e-library "LIB"
Source here: http://www.lib.izmailonline.com/wiki.html
Comment